Rambus (Nasdaq: RMBS) is a stock that I have followed for years -- essentially since its IPO in 1997. I consider myself a periodic trader in this stock -- buying when I feel that it has reached a low point, and selling when it reaches a high.
This past Monday, Hamed Khorsand, an analyst with BWS Financial raised his rating on the stock from hold to buy. (BWS stands for "Beating Wall Street," by the way. This is something I found out on the company website, which looks somewhat amateurish if I say so myself.) According to an Associated Press
article, Rambus rose $1.98, or 13 percent, to close at $17.63 after the analyst upgrade. The analyst cites Rambus' improving legal environment as the reason for his upgrade. By its nature, this particular stock is that it reacts quickly to speculation and rumor. I am surprised (but not shocked) that one individual analyst could cause the stock to move so much in a day. The traders in this stock
want to believe that somebody knows something, even if it is some amateur stock analyst.
However, I can tell you that this analyst now has egg all over his face; RMBS closed out the week at $11.38, a 35% decline from its price just after the analyst's buy recommendation. If "beating Wall Street" means losing 35% of a client's money in a week, then I'm thinking that I maybe even I could qualify to be a stock analyst.
Let's do a little reality check. Rambus has been embroiled in the stock option backdating scandal. On July 19th, Rambus released a statement that it would need to restate earnings as far back as 2003. This came as a result of their own investigation of improperly dated option grants. Furthermore, they said that they would not be able to complete their quarterly report (Form 10-Q) before August 14th, and that the Nasdaq exchange may delist their stock as a result. This was
before the analyst upgrade.
On Wednesday of this week, the Federal Trade Commission ruled that Rambus had a monopoly on chip technology. (I am simplifying things here, to keep a long story short.) This FTC ruling caused Rambus' price to drop 25% on Wednesday alone.
My point is that I don't know what on Earth the analyst was thinking when he touted "Rambus' improving legal environment." Is he deliberately trying to manipulate the stock price, or is he just plain incompetent? Do you see why I don't trust stock analysts?
Ok, so do you want to know my recommendation? Currently, I am neither long nor short on RMBS. The stock is down 75% from it's 52-week high of $46.99. I bought the stock sometime last year, and most recently sold it at $31 in January. (For a while, RMBS kept on rising, and I wondered if I had made the right move.) Now that it is down significantly from its high, it is approaching a point where I might consider buying it again, but there may still be some downside. I would advise a wait and see attitude, and perhaps let the August 14th date come and go before rushing into action. In any case, I do not believe that RMBS is the type of stock that one should buy-and-hold.
I will issue one warning. Rambus stock is
very volatile. It is definitely not recommended for anyone that cannot stomach the severe ups and downs of the stock market. If you do buy this stock, it is best to heed my caution and sell too soon rather than sell too late.